DeCaro Doran

Our firm is a regional leader, offering legal services to individuals and businesses alike. With three offices, we are minutes from the Nation's Capital, Baltimore, Annapolis, and Northern Virginia. We are dedicated to delivering cost-effective and exceptional legal counsel with individualized attention to every client.


DeCaro Doran is proud to announce that Partner, Christopher R. Dunn has once again been named as a Top Lawyer by Washingtonian Magazine.  The final list of Top Lawyers is comprised of Washington’s best legal talent in multiple practice specialties selected by a vote of their peers and an extensive review process.
An amendment to Rule 1:1 of the Supreme Court of Virginia became effective on November 1, 2018. Rule 1:1 provides that final judgments, decrees and orders remain under the control of the trial court, and are subject to modification, for 21 days. Rule 1:1 coincides with Rule 1:2, which allows appeal of a partial final judgment, and Rule 5:9, which mandates noticing an appeal within 30 days of entry of any final judgment, decree or order.
In Heffington v. Moser Maryland’s Court of Special Appeals addressed a novel issue – under what circumstances is a trial court required to grant a stay to a civil litigant due to an assertion of the right against self-incrimination.  Generally, jurors in a civil action are permitted to take note of a litigant’s refusal to testify when that litigant asserts his Fifth Amendment right not to testify. 
Due to unforeseen circumstances the Insurance Litigation Defense Seminar originally scheduled for October 30, 2018 has been postponed until Spring 2019.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in the case of Encompass Ins. Co. v. Stone Mansion Rest., Inc., No. 17-1479, 2018 LEXIS 23576 (3rd Cir., Aug. 22, 2018), recently held that a defendant may remove a case from its home state court to federal court if they do so before the defendant has been properly served.
Now that Maryland, and several other states and jurisdictions have decriminalized cannabis for medical use, there is a new and unique employment issue to consider.  What could/should an employer do when an employee tests positive for cannabis?


DeCaro, Doran, Siciliano, Gallagher and DeBlasis LLP
Maryland Office
17251 Melford Boulevard
Suite 200
Bowie, MD 20715
Virginia Office
3930 Walnut Street
Suite 250
Fairfax, VA 22030
Washington, D.C. Office
1100 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
Suite 950
Washington, D.C. 20036
American Bar Association
Maryland State Bar Association
Super Lawyers
Themis Advocates Group